What this review establishes
The completed welfare check does not answer the later force question.
What the clip cannot establish alone
This public Voss review identifies observable timing, camera position, and evidentiary limits. It is not a finding of misconduct and is not legal advice.
- The complete unedited record may contain additional context.
- Other camera angles, witness accounts, and later official findings may change the analysis.
Speech verification status
not published with this legacy receipt. No machine-generated wording is presented here as a verified quotation.
Follow the record
Short, transformed excerpts from a first-party public critical-incident release used for criticism, review and reporting with attribution; no ownership or endorsement claimed.
Open recorded source ↗Caption and search topics
HE WAS NOT THE SUBJECT OF THE WELFARE CHECK. Phoenix Police says officers had completed that call when they encountered another man, saw a gun and fired. Voss finding: test what was visible before every shot, whether a warning and cover were feasible, and whether the situation changed between volleys. Possible Fourth Amendment issue; investigations remain ongoing and no legal or policy conclusion is made here. Original-speed audio preserved. Source: https://www.phoenix.gov/newsroom/police-department-news/critical-incident-briefing---december-27--2025---2800-w-larkspur.html Original: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aNKjyvGK25s Independent review—not legal advice. Do not contact or target participants. Submit footage: vossadvisory.com #Voss #Bodycam #PoliceAccountability